Arizona polygraph examiners needed: Tuscon polygraph and Phoenix polygraph
Due the overwhelming Internet footprint of PEOA.US , additional polygraph examiners are needed for areas along the 10 in Arizona.
peoamail@aol.com
Saturday, May 28, 2016
Friday, May 27, 2016
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner-- got too personal, and was heard asking Examinee "What results do you want?"
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner-- got too personal, and was heard asking Examinee "What results do you want?"
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: F
Several months ago, client wanted his wife tested for infidelity due to a large amount of indicators that she was likely having sex with a co-worker.
Examiner talked to both parties, asking them about their lives together, issues, etc. (Not appropriate. An examiner MUST be neutral-- if examiner hears --for example-- that one party is an abusive drug user and the other party is practically a saint, because polygraph results are 'an opinion' such private prejudicial knowledge may be influential and is not a part of a legitimate exam)
Examiner tested the wife. Then Examiner came out saying something like "You lovebirds go home-- she passed".
Evidence that the husband had, combined with Examiner's improper knowledge of their personal lives and the asking of examinee what results she wanted, left client suspicious for months. He requested a fresh testing with a more experienced examiner.
Wife continually showed major likeliness of deception results only on one of client's questions-- and it was of an activity he had suspected. Both examinee and client viewed the three charts-- and then observed the charts of many other charts conducted at no additional cost. Examinee and client both fully observed the charts and could each clearly see the consistent chart differences on that one question.
Client left the second exam satisfied that his suspicion about the first exam's lack of validity was fully confirmed.
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: F
Several months ago, client wanted his wife tested for infidelity due to a large amount of indicators that she was likely having sex with a co-worker.
Examiner talked to both parties, asking them about their lives together, issues, etc. (Not appropriate. An examiner MUST be neutral-- if examiner hears --for example-- that one party is an abusive drug user and the other party is practically a saint, because polygraph results are 'an opinion' such private prejudicial knowledge may be influential and is not a part of a legitimate exam)
Examiner tested the wife. Then Examiner came out saying something like "You lovebirds go home-- she passed".
Evidence that the husband had, combined with Examiner's improper knowledge of their personal lives and the asking of examinee what results she wanted, left client suspicious for months. He requested a fresh testing with a more experienced examiner.
Wife continually showed major likeliness of deception results only on one of client's questions-- and it was of an activity he had suspected. Both examinee and client viewed the three charts-- and then observed the charts of many other charts conducted at no additional cost. Examinee and client both fully observed the charts and could each clearly see the consistent chart differences on that one question.
Client left the second exam satisfied that his suspicion about the first exam's lack of validity was fully confirmed.
Friday, May 20, 2016
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
MMRSA compliance polygraph testing for California Marijuana Dispensaries
MMRSA compliance polygraph testing for California Marijuana Dispensaries
With the 2016 passing of the California Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, persons involved in the legal marijuana businesses face much regulatory compliance.
MarijuanaPolygraph.com and www.peoa.US have been instrumental in developing lie-detection testing to be used to provide proof of full compliance with
--MMRSA
--AB 266
--AB 243
--AB 643
--California BMMR Bureau of Medical Marijuana Regulation sections
--and all other local and state regulations involving marijuana cultivation, transportation and distribution laws.
With the 2016 passing of the California Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, persons involved in the legal marijuana businesses face much regulatory compliance.
MarijuanaPolygraph.com and www.peoa.US have been instrumental in developing lie-detection testing to be used to provide proof of full compliance with
--MMRSA
--AB 266
--AB 243
--AB 643
--California BMMR Bureau of Medical Marijuana Regulation sections
--and all other local and state regulations involving marijuana cultivation, transportation and distribution laws.
Friday, April 29, 2016
Maui and other Hawaii polygraph examiners needed
Maui and other Hawaii polygraph examiners needed
PEOA's five Hawaii-based polygraph websites are bringing in more requests than can be handled!
peoamail@aol.com
PEOA's five Hawaii-based polygraph websites are bringing in more requests than can be handled!
peoamail@aol.com
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Monday, April 25, 2016
Bradenton FL: nightclubs/bars need polygraph testing
Bradenton FL: nightclubs/bars need polygraph testing
Money thefts
peoamail@aol.com
Money thefts
peoamail@aol.com
Friday, April 22, 2016
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner-- she asked a customer to make a false negative Yelp complaint about services from another examiner that the client had never even been to!
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner-- she asked a customer to make a false negative Yelp complaint about services from another examiner that the client had never even been to!
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: F
Client called various examiners for exam prices. Test was needed for a lawsuit.
One examiner, well-known for badmouthing her competitors, got upset when she learned he was already likely to use a lower-price examiner than she was charging.
Client advises that she then tried to make a deal with him that included her instruction for him to immediately make a false Yelp negative complaint about services performed by the lower-price (but far more experienced) examiner-- even though client had never even been to the lower-priced examiner!
Client chose to not use the offensive examiner who asked him to lie to Yelp, saying he was notifying Yelp of her deceitful unprofessional instructions. He also wrote to the offended examiner, offering to be a witness if the unprofessional examiner was to be sued.
Note: Sadly, similar 'make phony Yelp complaints' have been reported about her in the past.
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: F
Client called various examiners for exam prices. Test was needed for a lawsuit.
One examiner, well-known for badmouthing her competitors, got upset when she learned he was already likely to use a lower-price examiner than she was charging.
Client advises that she then tried to make a deal with him that included her instruction for him to immediately make a false Yelp negative complaint about services performed by the lower-price (but far more experienced) examiner-- even though client had never even been to the lower-priced examiner!
Client chose to not use the offensive examiner who asked him to lie to Yelp, saying he was notifying Yelp of her deceitful unprofessional instructions. He also wrote to the offended examiner, offering to be a witness if the unprofessional examiner was to be sued.
Note: Sadly, similar 'make phony Yelp complaints' have been reported about her in the past.
Saturday, April 2, 2016
More polygraph examiners needed: Seattle/Tacoma WA and throughout Florida
More polygraph examiners needed: Seattle/Tacoma WA and throughout Florida
PEOA's many many websites are producing more requests than can be currently covered.
Contact www.PEOA.US or call 818 883-6969 if you are a competent examiner in those areas
PEOA's many many websites are producing more requests than can be currently covered.
Contact www.PEOA.US or call 818 883-6969 if you are a competent examiner in those areas
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: UNK
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: F
Client says they paid $250 to have this examiner come to their home. Late, she called to say she had car troubles. When she arrived, she said she had a flat tire. The man that drove her to the client's home stayed outside in a car.
Examiner had told them they could ask as many questions on the test as they wanted to. They had prepared 10.
Client waited outside. Examiner came outside after 15 minutes and said that client's spouse passed all questions.
Not a valid exam. An exam can use no more than 4 questions of importance, not 10, not unlimited. And 15 minutes is not enough time to do enough explaining and chart collection.
Same examiner: years of "I'm late-- car troubles" complaints, and years of 'no report' complaints and/or 'appeared confused or inexperienced' complaints.
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: UNK
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: F
Client says they paid $250 to have this examiner come to their home. Late, she called to say she had car troubles. When she arrived, she said she had a flat tire. The man that drove her to the client's home stayed outside in a car.
Examiner had told them they could ask as many questions on the test as they wanted to. They had prepared 10.
Client waited outside. Examiner came outside after 15 minutes and said that client's spouse passed all questions.
Not a valid exam. An exam can use no more than 4 questions of importance, not 10, not unlimited. And 15 minutes is not enough time to do enough explaining and chart collection.
Same examiner: years of "I'm late-- car troubles" complaints, and years of 'no report' complaints and/or 'appeared confused or inexperienced' complaints.
Friday, March 25, 2016
Seeking polygraph bids, DSH-Atascadero California, Polygraph Services; 15-10109-000
DSH-Atascadero California, Polygraph Services; 15-10109-000
The Department of State Hospitals – Atascadero is currently seeking bids for polygraph services, IFB 15-10109-000. Please see attached Invitation for Bid (IFB). This bid solicitation is published online at the California E-Procure, FI$Cal web site at:https://caleprocure.ca.gov/pages/index.aspx. The supplier community and public are encouraged to register their businesses with Cal eProcure. If you should need assistance or have registration/login questions, there is a Help icon on the top of the website athttps://caleprocure.ca.gov with the appropriate contact information to help you along your way.
If you have any questions please don’t hesitant to email me at sari.wray@dsh.ca.gov. Deadline for submission of questions is 4/06/16 at 2:00PM.
Thank you for your time and assistance in meeting this need.
Please kindly acknowledge receipt of this email.
Sari Wray
Staff Services Analyst, Procurement Office
Department of State Hospitals – Atascadero
10333 El Camino Real
Atascadero, CA. 93422
Desk: (805) 468.3363
Fax: (805) 468.3261
Email: sari.wray@dsh.ca.gov
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Matzalan Mexico polygraph exam needed
Matzalan Mexico polygraph exam needed
Test his fiance' before marriage
MexicoPolygraph.com
peoamail@aol.com
Test his fiance' before marriage
MexicoPolygraph.com
peoamail@aol.com
Milwaukee man needs polygraphs to determine which of his adult children is stealing his medication
Milwaukee man needs polygraphs to determine which of his adult children is stealing his medication
peoamail@aol.com
peoamail@aol.com
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: NO
Examiner gender: M
Client says they paid more than $300 to have her husband tested for fidelity. She said husband had insisted on choosing the examiner, and that he had called around before choosing this one.
Client said examiner tested husband behind a closed door and was done in 15 minutes.
Examiner provided client with a printout from the polygraph instrument that showed all (I, R and C) questions used, showed MGQT to have been used, and showed the final computer scoring of NDI.
However, as this printout was later reviewed by neutral examiners, it also revealed a glaring fact: the examiner did not use C questions written as taught by federal polygraph academy. Both improperly worded, one C question was actually just another R question. Appears that the examiner does not follow the required Control Question Theory as is the basis of examinations of the past several decades (this is not the proper venue for listing specifics). The computer scoring can not be blamed as its users are assumed and required to use properly worded C questions when filling in those blanks
Not a valid exam. Examiner should simply take a refresher seminar on CQ wording/scoring.
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: NO
Examiner gender: M
Client says they paid more than $300 to have her husband tested for fidelity. She said husband had insisted on choosing the examiner, and that he had called around before choosing this one.
Client said examiner tested husband behind a closed door and was done in 15 minutes.
Examiner provided client with a printout from the polygraph instrument that showed all (I, R and C) questions used, showed MGQT to have been used, and showed the final computer scoring of NDI.
However, as this printout was later reviewed by neutral examiners, it also revealed a glaring fact: the examiner did not use C questions written as taught by federal polygraph academy. Both improperly worded, one C question was actually just another R question. Appears that the examiner does not follow the required Control Question Theory as is the basis of examinations of the past several decades (this is not the proper venue for listing specifics). The computer scoring can not be blamed as its users are assumed and required to use properly worded C questions when filling in those blanks
Not a valid exam. Examiner should simply take a refresher seminar on CQ wording/scoring.
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: NO
Examiner gender: M
Client says she paid $400 to have her husband tested for fidelity.
Client said examiner did not use the two questions that client wanted asked, instead using generic questions.
Client says the test was a waste of time because her two questions were not answered.
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: NO
Examiner gender: M
Client says she paid $400 to have her husband tested for fidelity.
Client said examiner did not use the two questions that client wanted asked, instead using generic questions.
Client says the test was a waste of time because her two questions were not answered.
Monday, March 7, 2016
Complaint about a Washington polygraph examiner
Complaint about a Washington polygraph examiner
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: NO
Examiner gender: M
Client says they paid $375 to have himself tested for fidelity.
Client said examiner told him that although the computer scoring said he had passed, his hand-scoring of the charts said he did not pass, and that he suspected 'countermeasures'.
Client said that he was completely telling the truth and was ripped off.
(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )
APA member: YES
Recent past complaints: NO
Examiner gender: M
Client says they paid $375 to have himself tested for fidelity.
Client said examiner told him that although the computer scoring said he had passed, his hand-scoring of the charts said he did not pass, and that he suspected 'countermeasures'.
Client said that he was completely telling the truth and was ripped off.
Did you know . . . ?
Did you know that during the week following the use of a polygraph on a television show, whether it was a 'silly' show or a 'scientific' show, calls increase for several days to examiners nationwide?
Saturday, March 5, 2016
323 area code man calling around, looking for a 'Guaranteed Pass'
323 area code man calling around, looking for a 'Guaranteed Pass'.
He is saying "I need a polygraph test. I did cheat on my wife, but I need a polygraph test that says I didn't".
No legitimate examiner will ever agree to that.
He is saying "I need a polygraph test. I did cheat on my wife, but I need a polygraph test that says I didn't".
No legitimate examiner will ever agree to that.
More polygraph examiners are needed: Florida, Georgia and New York
More polygraph examiners are needed in Florida, Georgia and New York.
Thanks to PEOA's strong marketing presence, those states are producing more polygraph requests from the public than can be fit into the schedules of current coverage there.
Contact peoamail@aol.com if you are a competent polygraph examiner who can handle more exams.
Thanks to PEOA's strong marketing presence, those states are producing more polygraph requests from the public than can be fit into the schedules of current coverage there.
Contact peoamail@aol.com if you are a competent polygraph examiner who can handle more exams.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
