Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

The first 'polygraph secret' for polygraph clients had been added

The first 'polygraph secret' for polygraph clients had been added

PolygraphSecrets.com

Monday, July 27, 2020

This polygraph blog has had 72,000 views

This polygraph blog has had 72,000 views

POLYGRAPH BLOG

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Polygraph examiners needed in Delaware and Maryland

Thanks to PEOA's continually increasing polygraph web presence, more requests for same-day polygraph tests in Maryland and Delaware are being received than can be handled promptly.

If you are a competent examiner, have a polygraph business, and can promptly handle referrals, contact PEOA

Saturday, July 18, 2020

Hawaii polygraph examiners needed

If you are a competent polygraph examiner in Hawaii, have a polygraph business, and can promptly handle polygraph referrals, contact PEOA

PEOA's growing web presence is bringing about more inquiries than can be handled same-day.

Polygraph 'secrets' for the public!

What polygraph examiners DON'T want you to know.

(Not about how to 'beat' a polygraph test; these are secrets about prices, accuracy and much more)

PolygraphSecrets.com

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Lie detector test in Riverside California

Hold liars accountable to the truth with a Riverside polygraph examination at ACCOUNTABLEPOLYGRAPH.com

Thursday, July 9, 2020

530 area code man calling examiners, offering a 'big bonus' if he passes his relationship polygraph test

530 area code man calling examiners, offering a 'big bonus' if he passes his relationship polygraph test

Told of his wife and son living in two non-California cities, a 16 year marriage, and about his occupation

Was told to tell the truth and he would pass

He again told that a 'big bonus' would be paid if he passed

Examiner told him to stop offering a financial bonus.

Polygraph test in Ridgecrest California

Ridgecrest Polygraph

Polygraph test in Kern County

Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Saturday, July 4, 2020

Complaint about a California polygraph examiner: although the ads show a nice office building, the address was to an old house. Paid $350. Said inappropriate comments. He hooked up client to a blood pressure cuff and no other attachments. It was an old antique polygraph, no computer involved. No attachments were made to stomach, chest or fingers. Blood pressure cuff pumped so high it hurt badly from start. Said a licensed Private Investigator since 1980s. Said failed. Not true results, not a real polygraph test. Then client realized that this 'PI' or 'polygraph examiner' doesn't even have a website.

Complaint about a California polygraph examiner: although the ads show a nice office building, the address was to an old house. Paid $350. Said inappropriate comments. He hooked up client to a blood pressure cuff and no other attachments. It was an old antique polygraph, no computer involved. No attachments were made to stomach, chest or fingers. Blood pressure cuff pumped so high it hurt badly from start. Said a licensed Private Investigator since 1980s. Said failed. Not true results, not a real polygraph test. Then client realized that this 'PI' or 'polygraph examiner' doesn't even have a website.

Recent past complaints about this examiner: Y

Examiner gender: M

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Complaint about a California polygraph examiner: Client arrived with the quoted $350, after looking around, Client told Examiner that he wasn't comfortable with what he saw (read why below) and that he was going to contact another examiner instead. Examiner tried to change client's mind, including badmouthing other examiners. Client went to a more experienced examiner, paid less, and got accurate results.

Complaint about a California polygraph examiner: Client arrived with the quoted $350, after looking around, Client told Examiner that he wasn't comfortable with what he saw (read why below) and that he was going to contact another examiner instead. Examiner tried to change client's mind, including badmouthing other examiners. Client went to a more experienced examiner, paid less, and got accurate results.

Recent past complaints about this examiner: Y

Examiner gender: M

Client arrived with the questions and cash payment ready. After talking to examiner, it was felt to be 'not legit'. Client said it was a rent-by-the-hour office, not a polygraph office, so it was felt that the examiner must be a part-timer who doesn't do enough polygraph work per month to rent a regular office. Client told examiner that he was going to talk to other examiners before getting tested. Examiner, apparently already committed to rent the office for the hour, tried to dissuade Client from using examiner's competitors.

Same day, Client went to a more experienced examiner with a long-time professional polygraph office, paid less than the part-time examiner would have cost, and got professional results.