http://polygraphconnection.com/los-angeles-polygraph-tests.html
Thursday, December 30, 2021
Wednesday, December 29, 2021
Tuesday, December 28, 2021
Friday, December 24, 2021
Wednesday, December 22, 2021
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner: client needed to know which of her old drugs she was back using; the examiner said that if she failed on question then she fails all questions
In the past month have you used any heroin?
In the last month have you used any meth?
In the last month have you used any cocaine?
Examiner told him "If she fails one then she automatically fails all; there is no way to determine which drug she used". This is an examiner who badmouths other examiners.
Client went to a better examiner. The drug used was easily spotted and then she confessed.
Monday, December 20, 2021
NW Washington law enforcement pre-employment polygraph test needed for a city agency
NW Washington law enforcement pre-employment polygraph test needed for a city agency
peoa.US
Thursday, December 16, 2021
Polygraph examiner needed in Redding California / extreme northern California
Polygraph examniner needed in Redding CA
PEOA's increasing Internet coverage is bringing about more requests for polygraph tests in the northmost quarter of California than can be handled same-day.
If you are a competent polygraph examiner, have a polygraph business, and can promptly handle referrals, contact peoa.US
Monday, December 6, 2021
Northern Florida polygraph examiners needed
Northern Florida polygraph examiners needed (Jacksonville and more)
PEOA's growing Internet polygraph coverage is bringing more polygraph test requests than can be handled same-day.
If you are a competent examiner, have a current polygraph business, and can promptly handle referrals, contact PEOA.US
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner; charged $500 for test, told client she was being deceptive. Then she . . .
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner
Examiner charged $500 for test. Told client she failed (deception indicated). Client said she hadn't lied on a single question. Examiner suggested she try again on another day (and pay hime again).
Client went to another examiner that had far more experience yet was less costly, and didn't mention the first test or examiner. Her husband was allowed to quietly monitor the testing.
She passed.
It was discovered why she had failed the first testing (examiner's fault), but that is not a topic for a public list.