Complaints about a California polygraph examiner-- badmouthing competitors

Complaints about a California polygraph examiner-- badmouthing competitors

(No identifiers are listed. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, www.peoa.US )

Recent past complaints: Yes
Examiner gender: M

Over the past few years, clients reported some badmouthing had been done by one examiner against the other. But recently two more complaints were said to have been made by the same examiner.
Two clients, who have no connection to each other, advised that the same polygraph examiner made defamatory comments about the examiner badmouthed earlier. Both polygraph clients reported more or less the same words said to have been used, including 'fake', 'unlicensed' and 'fake tests'.
One client added that it was strongly felt that the quoted examiner automatically failed the examinee because they had first told the quoted examiner that the other examiner had scored him as passing. (A third examiner was next used to again test the examinee; the examinee obtained the same pass score as with the first examiner).
One client added that the quoted examiner asked to see what texted information the other examiner had sent to that client's phone when the client was calling around for prices (client said he paid the quoted examiner $220 for relationship testing)-- then the quoted examiner asked that the text conversation be copied & sent to the quoted examiner's own cell phone right then.
One client said that jealousy was detected when quoted examiner said "I do X-amount of exams per day while the other examiner does X+ exams per day".

Quoted examiner was contacted. He said that such reports were untrue and that he has never said anything negative about the other examiner.