Complaint about a California polygraph examiner: Client arrived with the quoted $350, after looking around, Client told Examiner that he wasn't comfortable with what he saw (read why below) and that he was going to contact another examiner instead. Examiner tried to change client's mind, including badmouthing other examiners. Client went to a more experienced examiner, paid less, and got accurate results.
Recent past complaints about this examiner: Y
Examiner gender: M
Client arrived with the questions and cash payment ready. After talking to examiner, it was felt to be 'not legit'. Client said it was a rent-by-the-hour office, not a polygraph office, so it was felt that the examiner must be a part-timer who doesn't do enough polygraph work per month to rent a regular office. Client told examiner that he was going to talk to other examiners before getting tested. Examiner, apparently already committed to rent the office for the hour, tried to dissuade Client from using examiner's competitors.
Same day, Client went to a more experienced examiner with a long-time professional polygraph office, paid less than the part-time examiner would have cost, and got professional results.
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner: Client arrived with the quoted $350, after looking around, Client told Examiner that he wasn't comfortable with what he saw (read why below) and that he was going to contact another examiner instead. Examiner tried to change client's mind, including badmouthing other examiners. Client went to a more experienced examiner, paid less, and got accurate results.
Friday, June 26, 2020
Many CA polygraph examiners also want a California Private Investigator license; here is the CA PI license test study material
Study material for the California Private Investigator PI license exam, click HERE
Wednesday, June 24, 2020
Saturday, June 20, 2020
310 area code guy asking for a fake polygraph report
310 area code guy asking for a fake polygraph report
No real examiner does anything other than to hang up on him.
No real examiner does anything other than to hang up on him.
PEOA was the first polygraph entity to provide polygraph training and other meetings by video conferencing
PEOA was the first polygraph entity to provide polygraph training and other meetings by video conferencing
For many years with Skype and others, now with the popular Zoom
www.peoa.US
For many years with Skype and others, now with the popular Zoom
www.peoa.US
Friday, June 19, 2020
253 area code person calling examiners asking for a fake polygraph pass report for himself as to fool his wife, asking for the fake report to be ready before he arrives. Said it was 'an emergency'.
253 area code person calling examiners asking for a fake polygraph pass report for himself as to fool his wife, asking for the fake report to be ready before he arrives. Said it was 'an emergency'.
Although he was using a Tacoma WA phone number, he said he was in City of Industry CA.
He didn't like it when he was called a moron and hung up on . . .
Although he was using a Tacoma WA phone number, he said he was in City of Industry CA.
He didn't like it when he was called a moron and hung up on . . .
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner; yet after all her threats and after all was investigated, it simply was that client was hoping her husband would fail yet he didn't
Complaint about a California polygraph examiner; yet after all her threats and after the matter was investigated, it simply was that client was hoping her husband would fail yet he didn't
Recent past complaints about this examiner: N
Examiner gender: M
Husband suggested he take a polygraph test to show he was a faithful husband.
They arrived at examiner's office after having put much thought and time into the writing of questions they wanted to be used for testing. Note: the actual longest part of a Federal 3-part polygraph test is The Pre-Test, where the questions are developed-- correctly, they took all the time they wanted in writing them and fine-tuning them instead AT HOME.
Husband completed testing, was found to have easily passed.
The next day, wife contacted Examiner and said another examiner badmouthed their choice of Examiner, so she wanted her money back. Examiner offered peer review and other accommodation; wife talked about legal action and online complaints and more if her money wasn't returned.
Peer-review of the charts brought the same NDI opinion.
Nasty threats and texts continued, so a neutral examiner with no connection to this client or test became involved.
It was pointed out to Wife that:
-- if indeed a competitor examiner did bad-mouth Examiner, she needs to get that in writing with his signature. Neutral examiner has filed libel lawsuits against other examiners in the past, the profession learning from his willingness to 'go legal', so such a phony badmouthing to be put in writing would never happen (IF this badmouthing examiner actually exists)
-- chart review by others showed that all guidelines were followed
-- chart review by others has brought the same NDI (No Deception Indicated) scoring
-- her own husband was not tested elsewhere obtaining opposite results
-- her claiming that 4 questions maximum was unfair actually is Federal guidelines maximum
-- a re-test by a neutral examiner at no cost could be arranged
-- her own husband (who was tested) verifies that he was telling the truth
-- she admits there is no proof that Examiner's opinion was wrong
-- in a nutshell, all her anger is because she didn't get fail results
-- her being unhappy with the results does not make them wrong
Recent past complaints about this examiner: N
Examiner gender: M
Husband suggested he take a polygraph test to show he was a faithful husband.
They arrived at examiner's office after having put much thought and time into the writing of questions they wanted to be used for testing. Note: the actual longest part of a Federal 3-part polygraph test is The Pre-Test, where the questions are developed-- correctly, they took all the time they wanted in writing them and fine-tuning them instead AT HOME.
Husband completed testing, was found to have easily passed.
The next day, wife contacted Examiner and said another examiner badmouthed their choice of Examiner, so she wanted her money back. Examiner offered peer review and other accommodation; wife talked about legal action and online complaints and more if her money wasn't returned.
Peer-review of the charts brought the same NDI opinion.
Nasty threats and texts continued, so a neutral examiner with no connection to this client or test became involved.
It was pointed out to Wife that:
-- if indeed a competitor examiner did bad-mouth Examiner, she needs to get that in writing with his signature. Neutral examiner has filed libel lawsuits against other examiners in the past, the profession learning from his willingness to 'go legal', so such a phony badmouthing to be put in writing would never happen (IF this badmouthing examiner actually exists)
-- chart review by others showed that all guidelines were followed
-- chart review by others has brought the same NDI (No Deception Indicated) scoring
-- her own husband was not tested elsewhere obtaining opposite results
-- her claiming that 4 questions maximum was unfair actually is Federal guidelines maximum
-- a re-test by a neutral examiner at no cost could be arranged
-- her own husband (who was tested) verifies that he was telling the truth
-- she admits there is no proof that Examiner's opinion was wrong
-- in a nutshell, all her anger is because she didn't get fail results
-- her being unhappy with the results does not make them wrong
This polygraph blog has had more than 70,000 views
This polygraph blog has had more than 70,000 views
Increase in viewership in past months is attributed to
--more persons wanting to start a polygraph business
--more persons looking to buy a used polygraph instrument
--more persons with polygraph businesses looking to increase their business
--more persons leaving law enforcement careers and wanting to be in a related occupation
Increase in viewership in past months is attributed to
--more persons wanting to start a polygraph business
--more persons looking to buy a used polygraph instrument
--more persons with polygraph businesses looking to increase their business
--more persons leaving law enforcement careers and wanting to be in a related occupation
323 area code person telephoning examiners, seeking help to falsely pass a relationship polygraph test
323 area code person telephoning examiners, seeking help to falsely pass a relationship polygraph test
Examiners have told him to F off.
Examiners have told him to F off.
Wednesday, June 17, 2020
Tuesday, June 16, 2020
Arizona and Montana polygraph examiners needed
Arizona and Montana polygraph examiners needed
Thanks to PEOA's strong Internet presence, we are obtaining calls for polygraph services in Arizona and Montana that can not be handled same-day as the request.
If you are a competent examiner, have a polygraph business, and can promptly handle referrals, contact PEOA
Thanks to PEOA's strong Internet presence, we are obtaining calls for polygraph services in Arizona and Montana that can not be handled same-day as the request.
If you are a competent examiner, have a polygraph business, and can promptly handle referrals, contact PEOA
New York Polygraph Examiner
Polygraph examiner in NYC
Polygraph test in The Bronx
Polygraph test in Manhattan
Polygraph test in Queens
Polygraph test in Staten Island
Polygraph test in Brooklyn
Polygraph test in The Bronx
Polygraph test in Manhattan
Polygraph test in Queens
Polygraph test in Staten Island
Polygraph test in Brooklyn
Sunday, June 14, 2020
Polygraph tests in hot weather: drink plenty of water in the hour or two prior to testing
Polygraph tests in hot weather: drink plenty of water in the hour or two prior to testing
If dehydrated, the examiner can not monitor the important moisture changes at the fingertips
If dehydrated, the examiner can not monitor the important moisture changes at the fingertips
Saturday, June 13, 2020
Polygraph test in La Jolla
For a La Jolla lie-detector test, visit: LA JOLLA POLYGRAPH
--Polygraph test in La Jolla California
--Polygraph test in Carmel Valley California
--Polygraph test in Torrey Pines California
--Polygraph test in University City California
--Polygraph test in Pacific Beach California
--Polygraph test in Mission Bay California
--Polygraph test in La Jolla California
--Polygraph test in Carmel Valley California
--Polygraph test in Torrey Pines California
--Polygraph test in University City California
--Polygraph test in Pacific Beach California
--Polygraph test in Mission Bay California
Friday, June 12, 2020
Complaint about a polygraph referral service: Client paid a service on the east coast $150 to introduce her to a supposedly 'expert' examiner on the west coast. Client arrived, it was a rent-by-the-hour office, not the examiner's own office. Client paid $400 more directly to examiner who said client was deceptive, that Client (a woman) strongly disputes, about cheating during her 20-year marriage. Examiner's strong Eastern-Europe accent also added to the problem. Then OUCH, the small print revealed . . .
Complaint about a polygraph referral service: Client paid a service on the east coast $150 to introduce her to a supposedly 'expert' examiner on the west coast. Client arrived, it was a rent-by-the-hour office, not the examiner's own office. Client paid $400 more directly to examiner who said client was deceptive, that client (a woman) strongly disputes, about cheating during her 20-year marriage. Examiner's Eastern-Europe accent had also added to the problem. Then OUCH, the small print revealed . . .
(No identifiers are listed here. If you recognize yourself here correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, peoa.US
Recent past complaints about this polygraph referral service: Y
Examiner gender: F
After what Client described as 'completely false results', research was done that revealed the danger of using such a blind-date type of referral service for a professional service. Further research revealed that this 'Examiner' herself only attended her first polygraph training in the last year!
But more research made the client angry.
On the multi-page polygraph referral website, if you go deep enough, it gives details about this new examiner who was referred this critical life-changing test. Shockingly, it revealed in writing:
"(Her) Total Number of (completed) Exams: Under 100" and "(She is a) Member since 2020 / under supervision of (the referral service owner), and "This member is a SUPERVISED examiner - all exams will be assisted by (the referral service owner). Further checking of the polygraph referral website revealed that this 'service' is using this trainee in many cities/counties outside of the county she lives in as their multi-county 'certified examiner referral' using other rent-by-the-hour office addresses.
Her strong accent was an even bigger problem due to her use of needlessly complicated question wording such as "Since you've been married to ___ have you touched another person's genitals for sexual gratification other than your husband?'.
Client claims that this 'supervisor' was not present. Client wants a refund of the useless $150 'match-making' fee and a refund of the $400 and feels they were ripped-off.
(No identifiers are listed here. If you recognize yourself here correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners Of America, peoa.US
Recent past complaints about this polygraph referral service: Y
Examiner gender: F
After what Client described as 'completely false results', research was done that revealed the danger of using such a blind-date type of referral service for a professional service. Further research revealed that this 'Examiner' herself only attended her first polygraph training in the last year!
But more research made the client angry.
On the multi-page polygraph referral website, if you go deep enough, it gives details about this new examiner who was referred this critical life-changing test. Shockingly, it revealed in writing:
"(Her) Total Number of (completed) Exams: Under 100" and "(She is a) Member since 2020 / under supervision of (the referral service owner), and "This member is a SUPERVISED examiner - all exams will be assisted by (the referral service owner). Further checking of the polygraph referral website revealed that this 'service' is using this trainee in many cities/counties outside of the county she lives in as their multi-county 'certified examiner referral' using other rent-by-the-hour office addresses.
Her strong accent was an even bigger problem due to her use of needlessly complicated question wording such as "Since you've been married to ___ have you touched another person's genitals for sexual gratification other than your husband?'.
Client claims that this 'supervisor' was not present. Client wants a refund of the useless $150 'match-making' fee and a refund of the $400 and feels they were ripped-off.
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Lie detector test in Downey
For the best polygraph test in Downey California, see: DOWNEY LIE DETECTION
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
Monday, June 8, 2020
(another) Complaint about a new California polygraph examiner: he charged her card $175 to test herself, said she failed including some 'inconclusive', offered to retest her for $200 cash, she failed again. She says she shouldn't have failed any, and the examiner told her a story about getting into a fight with another recent client (this fight previously listed as a complaint here). And still no written reports.
(another) Complaint about a new California polygraph examiner: he charged her card $175 to test herself, said she failed including some 'inconclusive', offered to retest her for $200 cash, she failed again. She says she shouldn't have failed any, and the examiner told her a story about getting into a fight with another recent client (this fight listed previously as a complaint here). And still no written reports.
(No identifiers are listed here. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners of America, peoa.US
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: M
Per client: She wanted to remove doubts her husband had regarding other men. Unknowingly, she chose a newly-graduated polygraph school with a new polygraph business. She said she felt something was amiss when she saw a mostly empty office. Then
(No identifiers are listed here. If you recognize yourself here, correct the situation for the future. Courtesy of Polygraph Examiners of America, peoa.US
Recent past complaints: YES
Examiner gender: M
Per client: She wanted to remove doubts her husband had regarding other men. Unknowingly, she chose a newly-graduated polygraph school with a new polygraph business. She said she felt something was amiss when she saw a mostly empty office. Then
This past weekend, PEOA added the web strength of more than 30 webpages
This past weekend, PEOA added the web strength of more than 30 webpages
Polygraph test in Los Angeles
A quick page already coming up in a google search: Los Angeles Polygraph
Friday, June 5, 2020
South Los Angeles polygraph testing
Polygraph test in South Los Angeles
Polygraph test in Florence
Polygraph test in Graham
Polygraph test in Watts
Polygraph test in Vernon
Polygraph test in Huntington Park
Polygraph test in Florence
Polygraph test in Graham
Polygraph test in Watts
Polygraph test in Vernon
Polygraph test in Huntington Park
Monday, June 1, 2020
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
